Legal Opinion

Rosenblum v. Judson Engineering Corp.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1954No. 4334PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodnow, J.

The motion of the defendant Glenn for dismissal of the action as to him should have been granted. The claim against him is that as one of the four partners in Rockmill Manufacturing Company he participated with the other three defendants in certain activities of the partnership which he knew were in violation of the duties owed to Judson Engineering Corporation by those three as officers and directors of that corporation. None of the defendants are residents of this state but the partnership has systematically and continuously engaged in business here. The other three defendants were…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  2. Henry L. Doherty & Co. v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Beaudette v. GrahamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  5. Lagarde v. Anniston Lime & Stone Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Cornwell v. CornwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. Kerrigan v. Unity Savings AssociationIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Ostrowski v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. Kimball v. New Hampshire Board of AccountancySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API