Smith Insurance v. Grievance Committee
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
In this case we address the constitutionality of RSA 402:75 (Supp. 1979), establishing the Grievance Committee empowered to review the termination by insurance companies of agency agreements between the companies and their agents. We *858hold that the statute is unconstitutional as an unlawful delegation of legislative power, an unlawful usurpation of judicial power, and an unlawful interference with pre-existing contracts.
In December 1976, Middlesex Insurance Company appointed Smith Insurance, Inc. as one of its agents. The written agreement provided that “[t]his Agreement may be terminated by…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Ferretti v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- Shell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services v. MarinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.