Legal Opinion

Smith Insurance v. Grievance Committee

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 23, 1980No. 80-087PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

In this case we address the constitutionality of RSA 402:75 (Supp. 1979), establishing the Grievance Committee empowered to review the termination by insurance companies of agency agreements between the companies and their agents. We *858hold that the statute is unconstitutional as an unlawful delegation of legislative power, an unlawful usurpation of judicial power, and an unlawful interference with pre-existing contracts.

In December 1976, Middlesex Insurance Company appointed Smith Insurance, Inc. as one of its agents. The written agreement provided that “[t]his Agreement may be terminated by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Ferretti v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Appeal of PlantierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Shell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  5. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services v. MarinoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API