Legal Opinion
Becker v. Kelsey
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 13, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ackehson, S. C. C.
The plaintiffs, Alfred H. Becker and the Summit Building and Loan Association, are seeking to recover damages from the defendants, Clarence Kelsey and William E. Ludwig, for the alleged breach of a written contract made between said Alfred E. Becker, party of the first part, Max Margulies, party of the second part and said Clarence Kelsey and William E. Ludwig, party of the third part, a copy of which is attached to and made a part of the complaint. It is to he noted that the plaintiff the Summit Building and Loan Association, is not directly a party to the contract.
*1266It is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. Independence Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Bay City Building & Loan Ass'n v. BroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Cross v. SnakenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Dunne v. Independent Order of ForestersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Northeastern Telephone &Telegraph Co. v. HepburnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fanarjian v. MoskowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Smyth Sales, Inc. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Riverside Fence Co. v. NovakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Talcott, Inc. v. ROTO AMERICAN CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Sethre v. Washington Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.