Cross v. Snakenberg
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Keokuk District Court.- — Horn W. G. Clements, Judge. This is an appeal from the action of the defendant, as county treasurer of Keokuk county, in making an assessment against plaintiff, a resident of said county, as upon moneys and credits omitted from assessment and taxation for the year 1901. The court below sustained the assessment, and plaintiff appeals. — ■
1Opinion of the Court
Bishop, J. — ■
In April, 1900, the appellee, Cross, entered into a contract in writing with one Hartzel for the sale of certain real estate owned by him and situated in Keokuk county. As far as material to an understanding of the mat*637ter of controversy now before us, the provisions of said contract were'that Cross bound bimself in a penal sum named, the condition being that, if Hartzell should pay $1,000 January 1, 1902, and $1,000 January 1, 1903, according to the tenor of two promissory notes bearing date even with the contract, and further should on the date last mentioned execute notes and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Muscatine Water Co. v. Muscatine Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Dows & Co. v. Morse & LillySupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Flanders v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Williams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Dallas County v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Becker v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- Motzner v. BoganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.