Legal Opinion

Northeastern Telephone &Telegraph Co. v. Hepburn

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided December 26, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Three causes tried together. Ou final hearing on bill, answer and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Pitney, V. C.

The object of these bills is to protect the complainant in the enjoyment of an easement in land by enjoining the disturbance thereof by the defendants. The easement was created by the predecessors in title of the several defendants in the three causes (which were tried together) by grant made to the predecessor in title of the complainant. The grant was for the right to set up, operate and maintain “a telegraph or telephone line or lines” over certain lands, and a telephone line was at once erected and has ever since been maintained.

The complainant and its predecessors in title…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Becker v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API