Legal Opinion

Dunne v. Independent Order of Foresters

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1921No. S. F. Nos. 9005, 9155PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Gavin McNab, R. P. Henshall, Nat Schmulowitz and F. W. Henshaw for Appellant in S. F. No. 9005 and Respondent in S. F. No. 9155.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

In this case three appeals are presented. By reason of the fact that the transcripts were filed at different times they received two numbers. No. 9005 is an appeal by the plaintiff from the part of the judgment denying her the relief asked in her complaint. No. 9155 presents appeals by the defendant from the part of the judgment which denied it relief upon its cross-complaint and from an order denying its motion that the judgment entered be vacated, and for the entry of a judgment in its favor on the cross-complaint. It is stipulated that the record filed in appeal No. 9005 may be used on all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ClarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Savings Bank of San Diego v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. Pacific Studios Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Becker v. KelseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
  3. Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. People's Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. State Compensation Ins. Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API