Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bell v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1995No. 93-2619PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Both sides object to the appellate court’s disposition.. While claimant seeks to compel an award of permanent total disability compensation pursuant to State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666, the commission seeks to reinstate its decision. For the reasons to follow, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Two of claimant’s objections fall quickly. First, the commission’s alleged lack of permanent total disability guidelines does not violate due process. State ex rel. Blake v. Indus. Comm. (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 453, 605 N.E.2d 23. Second, contrary to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State ex rel. Mitchell v. Robbins & Myers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State ex rel. DeMint v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Blake v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Packaging Corp. of Am. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Bell v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Certified Oil Corp. v. Mabe, 06ap-835 (7-31-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State ex rel. Cherryhill Management, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Lindsay v. Indus. Comm., Unpublished Decision (2-8-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API