Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Blake v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1992No. 91-1575PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

State ex rel. Noll, supra, reiterated the commission’s “responsibility to prepare fact-specific orders which will be meaningful upon review.” Id. at 206, 567 N.E.2d at 248. The commission’s boilerplate recitation of the nonmedical disability factors set forth in State ex rel. Stephenson v. Indus. Comm. (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 167, 31 OBR 369, 509 N.E.2d 946, would no longer suffice. Instead, the order “must specifically state what evidence has been relied upon to reach its conclusion and, most important, briefly explain the basis of its decision.” Noll, 57 Ohio St.3d at 206, 567 N.E.2d at 249.

Th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Eaton Corp. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State ex rel. Ormet Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State ex rel. Galion Manufacturing Division v. HaygoodOhio Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Sebestyen v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Unger v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API