Legal Opinion

Pulliam v. City of Greensboro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 20, 1991No. 9018SC1222PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Plaintiffs assign error to the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs contend that questions of material fact exist as to whether defendant’s operation and maintenance of its sewer lines was a proprietary or governmental function; if a governmental function, then whether defendant waived its governmental immunity by participating in a risk pool; and if so, whether plaintiffs’ forecast of evidence presented a material question of fact regarding defendant’s negligence.

Summary judgment is properly granted “if the pleadings, depositions, answers…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Walker v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Whitley v. CubberlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. City of Asheville v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Harrison v. City of SanfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Durham Land Owners Ass'n v. County of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Bostic Packaging, Inc. v. City of MonroeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Mulberry-Fairplains Water Ass'n, Inc. v. Town of North WilkesboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API