Legal Opinion

Durham Land Owners Ass'n v. County of Durham

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 2006No. COA05-736PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

Plaintiffs, all developers and home builders, sued Durham County (the County) alleging that the County’s “school impact fee” was imposed without proper enabling legislation from the General Assembly, and therefore illegal. The trial court agreed, ordered summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and mandated that the County refund plaintiffs their payments with interest. The County appealed to this Court arguing that: it possessed the necessary enabling legislation; the trial court erred in awarding plaintiffs summary judgment, repayment of the fees, and interest; and that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rowan County Board of Education v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Faulkenbury v. Teachers' & State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Smith Chapel Baptist Church v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lanvale Properties, LLC v. County of CabarrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. Quality Built Homes Inc. v. Town of CarthageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. China Grove 152, LLC v. Town of China GroveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. Union Land Owners Ass'n v. County of UnionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Point S. Props., LLC v. Cape Fear Pub. Util. Auth.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API