Legal Opinion

Whitley v. Cubberly

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1974No. 737SC710PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The sole assignment of error challenges entry of the order granting Parke, Davis’s motion for summary judgment. “Irrespective of who has the burden of proof at trial upon issues raised by the pleadings, upon a motion for summary judgment the burden is upon the party moving therefor to establish that there is no genuine issue of fact remaining for determination and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Trust Co., 282 N.C. 44, 51, 191 S.E. 2d 683, 688 (1972). Thus, in the present case defendant Parke, Davis, as the party moving for summary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Stevens v. Parke, Davis & Co.California Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Barger v. McCoy Hillard & ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Patricia W. Salmon, Guardian Ad Litem of Timothy B. Salmon, a Minor v. Parke, Davis and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API