Legal Opinion

Harrison v. City of Sanford

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 2006No. COA05-1001PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCullough, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from the granting of a motion for summary judgment where there was no genuine issue of material fact and defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Richard and Kathy Harrison (“the Harrisons”) own a residence located at 528 Summit Drive in Sanford, North Carolina, which is serviced by a main sewer line and manhole maintained and operated by the City of Sanford (“the City”). The Harrisons allege that on 8 August 2003 a large rain storm occurred in which the manhole located on the Harrisons’ property and operated and maintained by the City, begin…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Moore v. Coachmen Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. TillettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Edwards v. GE Lighting Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Babb v. Bynum & Murphrey, PLLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Watson v. Millers Creek Lumber Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Reidy v. Whitehart Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Jones v. Town of AngierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API