Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Raymond

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1888PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Mandamus. Relator applies for mandamus to compel respondent to vacate an order revoking its license to do business in this-. State. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Relator filed a petition for mandamus to compel the respondent', the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Michigan, to vacate an order made by him on April 2, 1888, revoking the license of relator to do business within, this State.

The relator is an insurance corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Connecticut, and for many years has transacted an insurance business in the State of Michigan. In February, 1887, it filed the necessary proofs and papers with the Commissioner of Insurance to obtain, and did obtain, a renewal of its authority to do business in. the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Paul v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. The Lafayette Ins. Co. v. FRENCHSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. People ex rel. Le Roy v. HurlbutMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  4. Speer v. StephensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. Board of Dental ExaminersWashington Supreme Court · 1903

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API