Legal Opinion
Nissan Motor Corp. v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 19, 1984No. Civ. 53381PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALDECOTT, P. J.
Appellants are Daly City Datsun, a new car dealer (hereinafter DCD or franchisee) and the New Motor Vehicle Board, a state agency (hereinafter Board). The respondent is Nissan Motor Corporation in U.S.A. (hereinafter Nissan or franchisor).
In October 1979 Nissan terminated DCD’s franchise on the ground that DCD had failed to fulfill the requirements of the franchise for the preceding four years. Pursuant to Vehicle Code 1 sections 3050-3069, DCD filed with the Board a protest against the intended termination of franchise. Following an extensive hearing the administrative…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Peters v. KiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Today's Fresh Start, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Office of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Sun Pacific Farming Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. New Motor Vehicle BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Gai v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Burrell v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.