Legal Opinion

Peters v. Kiff

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1972No. 71-5078PublishedCited by 646 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtJustice Marshall

Petitioner alleges that Negroes were, systematically excluded from the grand jury that indicted him and the petit jury that convicted him of burglary in the Superior Court of Muscogee County, Georgia. In consequence he contends that his conviction is invalid under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Because he is not himself a Negro, the respondent contends that he has hot suffered any unconstitutional discrimination, and that his conviction' must stand. ' On that ground, the Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of his petition for federal habeas corpus.…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by646 opinions

  1. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. McCleskey v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Lockhart v. McCreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

641 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API