Legal Opinion
Burrell v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 10, 1989No. B027696PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, J.
In this consolidated appeal, we consider the constitutionality of a portion of section 112 of the City Charter of Los Angeles. Section 112 gives a city employee the right to have the disciplinary measures ordered by an official in his or her department reviewed by the board of civil service commissioners (the Board). However, this charter provision limits the ability of the Board to reduce the disciplinary penalty by requiring that any reduction in the penalty recommended by the Board be consented to by the same official who originally imposed the discipline. In both of the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mays v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Binkley v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Gai v. City of SelmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- McMillen v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.