Legal Opinion
Bruce v. Martin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 15, 1988No. 87 Civ. 7737 (RWS)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Thomas A. Martin (“Martin”), Jack R. Orben (“Orben”), Kinderhill Corporation (“Kinderhill”), Kinderhill Se lect Bloodstock, Inc. (“Kinderhill Select”), Kinderhill Financial Services (“KFS”), Kinderhill Investment Company (“KFC”) and the 25 Kinderhill partnerships (the “limited partnerships”) (collectively, the “Kinderhill defendants”), have moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under: (i) Section 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act” or “33…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Susan R. Wexner v. First Manhattan Co., John R. Loomis and Joseph Stein, Jr., Individually and as Co-Partners of First Manhattan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Goldman v. McMahan, Brafman, Morgan & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Perez-Rubio v. WyckoffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Stevens v. EQUIDYNE EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES 1980District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.