Legal Opinion
Goldman v. McMahan, Brafman, Morgan & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 8, 1989No. 85 Civ. 2236 (PKL)PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This action involves various claims arising from the sales of partnership interests in defendant McMahan, Brafman, Morgan & Co. (“MBM”) in the early 1980’s.
The matter is presently before the Court on a motion by the defendant accounting firm of Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co. (“OAD”), to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint (“the Amended Complaint”).
OAD, as well as other defendants, moved to dismiss that original complaint in this action. 1 This Court granted that motion in part and denied it in part, and granted plaintiffs 2 leave to amend their…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Novak v. KasaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Novak v. KasaksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- In Re Livent, Inc. Noteholders Securities Litig.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- O'BRIEN v. National Property Analysts PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- In Re Alstom SA Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.