Legal Opinion

State v. Edelman

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 30, 1999No. 42812-8-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The primary issue presented in this case is whether a court has the authority to modify a restitution order entered under RCW 9.94A.142 to provide for payment to a victim’s estate after the victim has passed away. The State appeals the trial court’s orders dismissing its motion to sanction Elizabeth Edelman for noncompliance with a restitution order after the death of the named recipient and denying a motion to amend the order. We hold that a defendant’s restitution obligation does not automatically end when a victim dies and that the statutes permit the modification of a restitution order to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. SummersWashington Supreme Court · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API