State v. Edelman
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The primary issue presented in this case is whether a court has the authority to modify a restitution order entered under RCW 9.94A.142 to provide for payment to a victim’s estate after the victim has passed away. The State appeals the trial court’s orders dismissing its motion to sanction Elizabeth Edelman for noncompliance with a restitution order after the death of the named recipient and denying a motion to amend the order. We hold that a defendant’s restitution obligation does not automatically end when a victim dies and that the statutes permit the modification of a restitution order to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SummersWashington Supreme Court · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.