Legal Opinion
State v. Gonzalez
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 2010No. 81525-9PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
226 P.3d 131 (2010)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Robert Bustmante GONZALEZ, Appellant.
No. 81525-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued March 24, 2009.
Decided February 18, 2010.
Jeffrey Goldstein, Law Office of Jeff Goldstein, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
D. Angus Lee, Grant County Prosecutor's Office, Ephrata, WA, Teresa Jeanne Chen, Attorney at Law, Soap Lake, WA, for Respondent.
FAIRHURST, J.
¶ 1 Robert Bustmante Gonzalez seeks to reverse an order modifying the total amount of his restitution. He argues that the State violated RCW 9.94A.753, the restitution statute, when it sought to…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Lake v. Woodcreek Homeowners Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. SweanyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. GrayWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.