Legal Opinion
State v. Kinneman
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 2005No. 76051-9PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
119 P.3d 350 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Zachary A. KINNEMAN, Petitioner.
No. 76051-9.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued June 30, 2005.
Decided September 8, 2005.
Nancy P. Collins, Seattle, for Zachary A. Kinneman.
John Christopher Carver, Seattle, for State of Washington.
MADSEN, J.
¶ 1 Zachary Kinneman, an attorney, was convicted of 67 counts of theft in connection with real estate transactions that he handled for a client. Kinneman raises several challenges to an order of restitution, including the question whether Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. TobinWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.