Legal Opinion

State v. Enstone

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1999No. 65662-2PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

974 P.2d 828 (1999)

137 Wash.2d 675

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Douglas ENSTONE, Petitioner.

No. 65662-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued January 26, 1999.

Decided April 15, 1999.

Kathryn A. Russell, Nielsen, Broman & Assoc., James R. Dixon, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Lisa N. O'Toole and James Whisman, Deputies, Seattle, for Respondent.

ALEXANDER, J.

The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering the defendant, Douglas Enstone, to pay restitution for a crime victim's actual medical expenses absent a finding that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. BlightWashington Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. TobinWashington Supreme Court · 2007

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API