State v. Hughes
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The United States Supreme Court recently applied its reasoning in Apprendi v. New Jersey, *126530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000), to hold that any fact other than that of a prior conviction, which increases the applicable punishment, must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt (unless it is stipulated to by the defendant or the defendant waives his right to a jury finding). Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004).1
Fairhurst, J.
*126¶2 These three cases were consolidated to address (1) the continuing validity of the…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by255 opinions
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.