Legal Opinion

State v. Hughes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2005No. Nos. 74147-6; 75053-0; 75063-7PublishedCited by 255 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 The United States Supreme Court recently applied its reasoning in Apprendi v. New Jersey, *126530 U.S. 466, 490, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000), to hold that any fact other than that of a prior conviction, which increases the applicable punishment, must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt (unless it is stipulated to by the defendant or the defendant waives his right to a jury finding). Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S. Ct. 2531, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004).1

Fairhurst, J.

*126¶2 These three cases were consolidated to address (1) the continuing validity of the…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by255 opinions

  1. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. NataleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 2006

250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API