Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. American Excelsior Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStern, J.
Appellant’s first proposition of law before this court is that the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error by failing to comply with App. R. 12(A) in passing upon the second assignment of error before it. We agree.
App. R. 12(A) provides, in pertinent part:
“* * * All errors assigned and briefed [in the Court of Appeals] shall be passed upon by the court in writing, stating the reasons for the court’s decision.” Here, as in Smith v. Jaggers (1973), 33 Ohio St. 2d 1, the Court of Appeals failed to comply with the mandate of App. R. 12(A).
The record in this case bears evidence of the import…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Smith v. JaggersOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Rothfuss v. Hamilton Masonic Temple Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Gannett v. BooherOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Criss v. Springfield TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.