Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. of North America v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1981No. Nos. 80-619 and 80-620PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.

This case presents three issues: (1) whether Ansul has effectively disclaimed all implied warranties with Automatic Sprinkler; (2) whether Ansul has effectively excluded all liability for consequential damages; and (3) whether Automatic Sprinkler must indemnify Ansul against all claims arising in this litigation. Resolving each of these issues requires an interpretation of paragraph 9.

We hold that Ansul has neither disclaimed its liability for implied warranties nor excluded its liability for consequential damages.

I

Ansul attempted to disclaim all liability to Automatic Sprinkler for breach of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sterner Aero Ab and Various Underwriters at Lloyds v. Page Airmotive, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
  2. Construction Aggregates Corporation v. Hewitt-Robins, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
  3. Avenell v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Cox Motor Car Company v. CastleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  5. Carrothers v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Eagle v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Westfield Insurance v. Huls America, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Ohio University Board of Trustees v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Vanyo v. Clear Channel WorldwideOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API