Rothfuss v. Hamilton Masonic Temple Co.

In the Court of Appeals, the defendant enumerated the following assignments of error:

“The court erred in admitting evidence of the plaintiff over the objection of the defendant.

“The court erred in its general charge to the jury.

“The verdict appears to be excessive and rendered under the influence of passion and prejudice.

“The verdict is excessive and is manifestly against the weight of the evidence and is not sustained by sufficient evidence.

“Other errors occurring during the trial prejudicial to the rights of the defendant.”

E. C. 2505.21 provides:

“ * * * All errors assigned and briefed shall…