Smith v. Jaggers
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The merits of the controversy between plaintiffs and defendant are not now before this court.
App. R. 12(A) provides, in pertinent part: “* * * All errors assigned and briefed [in the Court of Appeals] shall be passed upon by the court in writing, stating the reasons for the court’s decision.”
Here, the Court of Appeals failed to comply with the provisions of App. R. 12(A), even after being specifically requested to state in writing its reasons for overruling appellant’s assignments of error.
The motion to certify the record is, therefore, allowed.
Our jurisdiction in this ease, however, may be…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. 1981 Dodge Ram VanOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Gannett v. BooherOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dent v. WinkleOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. American Excelsior Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.