Legal Opinion
Dent v. Winkle
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 29, 1987No. 86-1017PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This appeal presents two issues surrounding the Real Estate Recovery Fund, R.C. 4735.12. The first is whether either Dent or St. John obtained a final judgment against Gary Wolf in his capacity as a real estate broker on the grounds of conduct in violation of R.C. Chapter 4735. The second issue is whether their applications were timely filed, pursuant to R.C. 4735.12(B). We find that neither applicant obtained a final judgment against Gary Wolf as a real estate broker, and that both applicants, even assuming their judgments against Wolf were based on violations of R.C. Chapter 4735, failed to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lemler v. Real Estate CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. American Excelsior Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
- Smith v. JaggersOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- Ruby v. HardinOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
- Baltimore Savings & Loan Co. v. FryeOhio Supreme Court · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weiland v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Ball v. RitenourOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Zell v. Ohio Superintendent of Real EstateOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Harbeitner v. Superintendent, Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Harbeitner v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce, Div. of Real EstateOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.