Legal Opinion

Alfinito v. Sater

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1966No. Civ. 22587PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

Defendants have appealed from adverse judgments in separate actions, consolidated for trial, in which plaintiffs were granted decrees of specific performance of an alleged obligation to convey interests in land to the respective plaintiffs.

The controversy revolves around the interpretation of a certain agreement of joint venture which was executed by all of the parties. The basic questions are: (1) were the plaintiffs’ rights to purchase an interest in the land which was the subject of the joint venture dependent upon the commencement of construction or other conditions relating to the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. DeGarmo v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. Riverside Fence Co. v. NovakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Fogarty v. SaathoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Mayo v. Pacific Project Consultants, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API