Legal Opinion
Fogarty v. Saathoff
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1982No. Civ. 25104PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
The trial court gave judgment for specific performance in favor of Thomas E. and Joan M. Fogarty, hereafter plaintiffs or buyers, and against Maria T. Saathoff also known as Maria T. Swiskoski, hereafter defendant or seller, in respect to an agreement for the purchase and sale of a condominium. Defendant appeals.
Facts
On July 30, 1978, the parties executed a purchase contract and deposit receipt for the purchase and sale of the property. The contract contained a provision for a 21-day escrow and provided that time was of the essence. It further provided that all modifications…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- King v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Leiter v. HandelsmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Henry v. SharmaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Stratton v. TejaniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ninety Nine Investment, Ltd. v. Overseas Courier ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Stevens Group Fund IV v. Sobrato Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.