Legal Opinion

State v. Freeman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1983No. 623PA82PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

State’s Appeal

The State contends that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the State failed to comply with the Speedy Trial Act. G.S. § 15A-701(al)(3) provides in pertinent part:(al) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) the trial of a defendant charged with a criminal offense who is ar rested, served with criminal process, waives an indictment or is indicted, on or after October 1, 1978, and before October 1, 1983, shall begin within the time limits specified below:(3) When a charge is dismissed, other than under G.S. 15A-703 or a finding of no probable cause…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. WeaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. . HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. State v. HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estrada v. BurnhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. DammonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API