State v. Howley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
The assignments of error presented in the record on this appeal fail to reveal prejudicial error.
First: It is contended that the court erred in refusing to grant defendants’ motion (a) to quash the bill of indictment, and (b) in arrest of judgment for that the bill fails to charge an offense.'
The statute, C. S., 4277, under which defendants are indicted, deleting verbiage not significantly related to the case in hand, declares that “If any person shall knowingly and designedly by means of any . . . other false pretense whatsoever, obtain from any person or corporation within the State any…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- State v. . AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- McLamb v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.