Legal Opinion

Tomlinson v. Camel City Motors, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1991No. 93PA91PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

This action was filed on 29 January 1988 by the plaintiff-appellant for actual damages, consequential damages, special damages, treble damages for unfair or deceptive acts or practices under N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1, and reasonable attorney fees. The defendant surety answered; however, the defendant car dealership failed to answer the complaint. Default judgment was entered on 23 October 1989 against the car dealership. The trial court awarded the plaintiff $3,459.72 in damages pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1 which was trebled pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 75-16. The court also awarded the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Seafare Corp. v. Trenor Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Falls Sales Co. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Darr v. LongNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Triplett v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ferris v. HaymoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  2. George v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Edmonds v. Western Surety Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. MARKET AMERICA, INC. v. RossiDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
  5. Etter v. PiggCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API