Legal Opinion
In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 1, 2003No. 02-MD-1468-JWLPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This multidistrict litigation consists of numerous putative class action lawsuits arising from the practices of defendants AT & T Corporation (“AT & T”) and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. (“Sprint”) and non-party MCI WORLD-COM Network Services, Inc. and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. (collec tively “MCI”) 1 of charging their customers to recoup these carriers’ contributions to the federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) program. The Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) administers the USF, a federal fund that subsidizes…
2Cases cited129 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re Weekley Homes, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2005
- Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Kristian v. Comcast Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, DelawareSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- In Re Potash Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.