Legal Opinion

Kristian v. Comcast Corp.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 20, 2006No. Nos. 04-2619, 04-2655PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to evaluate the enforceability of arbitration agreements that Comcast, a cable television provider, invoked against a group of its subscribers, who have sued it for violations of state and federal antitrust laws. Concluding that the arbitration agreements did not have retroactive effect, the district court ruled that the subscribers could not be compelled to arbitrate their antitrust claims. In so ruling, the district court did not have to reach a number of other issues raised by the subscribers in opposition to Com-cast’s demand for arbitration.

We…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., LpTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLCIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Levin v. Alms and Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dialysis Access Center, LLC v. RMS Lifeline, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  5. Awuah v. Coverall North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API