Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA
In this appeal we must determine whether a provision in an arbitration agreement that is part of a consumer contract of adhesion is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable because it forbids class-wide arbitration. Plaintiff entered into a short-term loan agreement, the terms of which she claims violate the State’s consumer-fraud statutes. Her complaint includes allegations that the State’s civil usury limits are being evaded in loan transactions such as hers by means of a conspiracy involving complex financial dealings among out-of-state financial entities. The damages allegedly caused by…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Quilloin v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Genesis HealthcareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.