Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, Delaware

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 9, 2006PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaVECCHIA

In this appeal we must determine whether a provision in an arbitration agreement that is part of a consumer contract of adhesion is unconscionable and therefore unenforceable because it forbids class-wide arbitration. Plaintiff entered into a short-term loan agreement, the terms of which she claims violate the State’s consumer-fraud statutes. Her complaint includes allegations that the State’s civil usury limits are being evaded in loan transactions such as hers by means of a conspiracy involving complex financial dealings among out-of-state financial entities. The damages allegedly caused by…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  2. Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  4. Quilloin v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  5. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Genesis HealthcareWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API