Legal Opinion
Wesley v. DeFonce Contracting Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 1, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
By an amended complaint the plaintiff seeks to recover in an action for money loaned. The defendants are the named corporation and Thomas J. DeFonce. ' No point is made, in this appeal, of the fact that the amended complaint alleges that the “defendant” borrowed the sum sued for in each of the two counts. Nor is any issue made of the fact that the judgment is that the plaintiff recover from the “defendants”. Both defendants appeal solely on the basic ground that promissory notes which entered into the transaction were usu rions. Doubtless the discrepancy between the complaint and the judgment…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kaplan v. Merberg Wrecking CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Lancaster v. Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Atlas Realty Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Engelke v. WheatleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robinson v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. DiBellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Marrinan v. HamerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Wilson v. HryniewiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. MiselisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.