Legal Opinion
State v. DiBella
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 30, 1968PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The defendants Anthony P. DiBella and Alfred J. Amaio were informed against, along with three other persons who are not involved in this appeal, on the charge of conspiracy. Greneral Statutes § 54-197. They were convicted after a jury trial and have appealed from the judgment rendered on the verdict. The defendant Amaio advanced eighteen, and the defendant DiBella advanced twenty-two, assignments of error. We treat as abandoned the many claims of error which are not briefed. State v. Miller, 154 Conn. 622, 624, 228 A.2d 136. Among the assignments of error which are pursued in the briefs, four…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Darwin v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. TropianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- State v. VincentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.