Wilson v. Hryniewicz
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtHennessy, J.
The defendants, Paul Hryniewicz and West Service Corporation, appeal from the trial court’s judgment. They claim that the trial court improperly denied (1) their motion to strike and (2) their motions for directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict on count one of the plaintiff’s complaint, which alleged that the defendants deprived the plaintiff of rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 The plaintiff, William H. Wilson, cross appeals and claims that the trial court improperly denied his motion to set aside a directed verdict in the defendants’ favor on the second count of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- State v. RiosConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Sabino v. RuffoloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Lakitsch v. BrandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DiNapoli v. CookeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Stuart v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Hryniewicz v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Ed Lally & Associates, Inc. v. DSBNC, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.