Legal Opinion

Marrinan v. Hamer

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 27, 1985No. 2956PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.

The defendant has appealed from a summary judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiffs in a summary process action concerning the termination of a lease agreement and the validity of a notice to quit.

The parties entered into a written lease whereby the defendant leased premises in West Haven from the plaintiffs for one year from August 1, 1982, through July 31,1983, for $6600, payable at a monthly rent of $550. On August 29,1983, the plaintiffs initiated a sum*102mary process action in two counts. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew the second count on September 22, 1983, and filed a revised…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Kapa Associates v. FloresConnecticut Superior Court · 1979
  4. Wesley v. DeFonce Contracting CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jefferson Garden Associates v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Housing Authority of East Hartford v. HirdConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. H. G. Bass Associates, Inc. v. Ethan Allen, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. HOUSING AUTH. OF CITY OF NEW HAVEN v. DeRocheConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API