Legal Opinion

Knop v. National Fire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by August Knop against the National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, on a ñre policy. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is an action to recover for loss by fire upon a policy of insurance which covered $300 on a *324one-story dwelling house, and $300 on household furniture and other contents. The principal defense was that the plaintiff had made a false statement under oath of the amount of the loss, and that he himself set the fire with intent to defraud the defendant.

1. The circuit court instructed the jury as follows:

“Now I come to a very important question. It is called in law ‘fraud.’ Fraud is a trick, a deceit, a device, whereby one misleads another to do something to his prejudice. In law, however, it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claflin v. Commonwealth InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Morley v. Liverpool & London & Globe InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Mullin v. Vt. Mutual Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1886

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Northern Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Campbell v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Barrett v. Connecticut Fire Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Merricourt v. Norwalk Fire InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API