Legal Opinion
Campbell v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1924No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Defendant insurer’s risk was $7,500 of a total of $22,500 fire insurance issued to Wilbur, Fay, Schmidt and Reynolds, trading as Charles C. Schmidt Auction Company, and covering a stock of furniture in Detroit. After loss, Wilbur, Schmidt and Reynolds assigned to Campbell, and he and Fay sued defendant on the policy. To review a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant brings error.
The policy provided:
“This entire policy shall be void, if the insured has concealed or misrepresented any material fact or circumstance concerning this insurance, or the subject thereof; or, in case of any fraud or false…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Monaghan v. Agricultural Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Watkins v. WallaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Peoples v. Evening News Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- J.C. Wyckoff & Associates, Inc. v. Standard Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Mina v. General Star Indemnity Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- West v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Stein v. Home-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Rayis v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.