Legal Opinion

Morley v. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Edget, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Plaintiff’s assignor, Joseph M. Lenhoff, was engaged in the clothing business in Fast Saginaw in February, 1887. His stock was insured to the amount of §13,000 in seven companies, of which the defendant was one, having a policy of 82,000. A fire occurred in the .store February 20, resulting in a total destruction of part of the stock, and damage to the rest. Among the provisions of this policy are the following :

“All fraud or attempt at fraud, by false swearing or otherwise, shall cause a forfeiture of all claims on this •company under this policy.”
“ When property is damaged, the assured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Chippewa Lumber Co. v. Phenix InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Marthinson v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Great Lakes Insurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  2. McNees v. Southern InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Schrepfer v. Rockford InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  4. McNees v. Southern InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Cussler v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API