Legal Opinion

Beeland v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1933No. 22628PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

On the trial of an issue made by a plea of non est factum, “other writings, proved or acknowledged to be genuine, may be admitted in evidence for the purpose of comparison by the jury. Such other new papers, when intended to be introduced, shall be submitted to the opposite party before he announces himself ready for trial.” Civil Code (1910), § 5836. Thus, on the trial of such an issue, under the mandate of the statute such papers, before they are admissible for comparison by the jury, must, even though they be “acknowledged to be genuine,” be submitted to the opposite party before he…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boone v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Austen v. MarzolfSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Marietta Fertilizer Co. v. GaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Bank of Commerce v. McCartyNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hartlep v. MurphyIndiana Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  2. Anderson v. Mechanics Loan & Savings Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Negim v. First State Bank of PicherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Griffeth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API