Legal Opinion

Negim v. First State Bank of Picher

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 18, 1935No. 25156PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OSBORN, V. c. J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Ottawa county by the First State ‘Bank of Picher, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Minta Negim, John T. Kolar, and Robert Shomberger as an action upon a promissory note and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage given to secure the same. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant Minta Negim appeals.

The petition of plaintiff alleges that on April 19, 1930, the defendant Minta Negim executed and delivered to the defendant John Kolar a promissory note in the sum of $12,000, payable in installments of $1,-000…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ford Motor v. WagonerTennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Hardy v. Chesapeake BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  3. Wiser v. LawlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Viele v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Boone v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Callaway v. Hamilton Nat. Bank of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  2. Scott v. First National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  3. Portilla v. Banco Popular de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. First National Bank of McAlester v. MannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  5. Portilla v. Banco Popular de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API