Legal Opinion

Hartlep v. Murphy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1926No. 24,378PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

Appellees other than William Marko, as plaintiffs, brought an action against William Randall, Aaron Larch and appellant, to recover on certain promissory notes payable to them purporting to have been executed by Randall as principal and Larch and appellant as sureties, and also to foreclose a mortgage executed by Randall conveying certain land to said sureties to secure the payment of the notes and to indemnify and protect the sureties against loss on account of such suretyship. The notes were dated April 24, 1920, and purported to have been signed by William Randall and Aaron F. Larch, and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hosford v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Haas v. ShawIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Carmichael v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Field v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. McAroy v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. M & I Bank v. First American National BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Sweigart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Jones Drilling Corporation v. RotmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Logan v. Hite, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. City Dairy Co. v. Uservo, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API