Mitchell v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.
So far as the first question is concerned, we have set forth verbatim the demurrers to the indictment as a whole in order that we may determine whether or not they show reversible error in the light of the indictment. Counsel for the defendant called to our attention no decisions to sustain his contentions that the court erred in overruling the demurrers. We have been unable to find any decision anywhere to sustain the contentions on behalf of the defendant on these assignments of error. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the indictment as a whole.
We will now discuss the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Suddeth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Kryder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Golden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Demonia v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
- Sellers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Geiger v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Gee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Millwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.