Marietta Fertilizer Co. v. Gary
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action upon bond; from city court of Nashville—Judge Christian. September 11, 1917.
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, j.
1. The law does not require an approval of the brief of evidence by opposing counsel, but requires only that it be approved by the trial judge. Price v. High, 108 Ga. 145, 149 (33 S. E. 956); Bugg v. State, 13 Ga. App. 672 (79 S. E. 748).
2. Any point of practice which, if sound, would be fatal to a motion for a new trial should be presented to the trial court by a motion to dismiss the application for a new trial, and, if not so presented, will be treated as having been waived. Walker v. Neil, 117 Ga. 733 (45 S. E. 387). Where the judge has finally passed on the merits of a motion…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Patton v. Bank of LaFayetteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Walker v. NeilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Price v. High & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Wilson v. BarnardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Paulk v. CreechCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Adams v. Overland-Madison Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
- Copeland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Tice Co. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Friedman v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.