Legal Opinion

Petty & Riddle, Inc. v. Lunt

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1942No. 6401PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, Justice.

This action was commenced in the District Court by respondent corporation for certain moneys claimed to be due from appellant on two separate counts. At the conclusion of the evidence the lower court instructed the jury to bring in a verdict in favor of respondent corporation in the sum of $288.86 on the first cause of action and $580.55 on the second. From a judgment entered on the verdict this appeal was taken.

Appellant’s points are three in number and may be set forth as follows; (1) The complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; (2) The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  2. McCarthy v. Mount Tecarte Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Lively v. TaborSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  4. McNair v. BurtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  5. Bicknell v. GarrettWashington Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nance v. L.J. Dolloff Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Staker v. Huntington Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Kersten v. Continental BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  4. State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Rito Cebolla Investments, Ltd. v. Golden West Land Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API