Legal Opinion

Staker v. Huntington Cleveland Irrigation Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1983No. 18203PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiff, a shareholder in the defendant irrigation company, filed this action to obtain reimbursement of excessive water fees he paid to the company. Judgment was entered for plaintiff for the overassess-ments plus prejudgment interest. On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion, made on the morning of trial, to amend its answer to assert for the first time the statute of limitations. Defendant also asserts that the trial court erred in granting prejudgment interest.

In March 1966, the irrigation company solicited its shareholders to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Emich Motors Corporation and U. S. Acceptance Corporation v. General Motors Corporation and General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  4. Girard v. ApplebyUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bjork v. April Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Timm v. DewsnupUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Chadwick v. NielsenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  4. James v. GaletkaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  5. Bragdon v. Twenty-five Twelve Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API